![]() ![]() To explain how matter can load up, I hypothesize that our electron constants h, e, and m are maxima. My similar tests performed with alpha-rays also contradict quantum mechanics. After plotting the times between photoelectric effect pulses from the two detectors and comparing to accidental chance, I report a seemingly two-for-one effect that contradicts a photon kind of energy conservation. One of my many successful beam-split coincidence tests with gamma-rays is described revealing the fail- ure of quantum mechanics. To assure a singly emitted source, the well-known true- coincidence test from nuclear physics is far more reliable than any test with visible light. In addition, a source of singly emitted radi- ation is required for these beam-split tests. The narrow pulse height distribution of gamma-ray detectors overcomes this detector problem. ![]() ![]() This is because TM recognizes a preloaded state, understood in the loading theories of Planck, Debye, and Millikan, but usually unrecognized. An analysis of pulse heights in detectors for visible light concludes that their pulse height distribution is too broad to make the quantum/threshold dis- tinction. The notion that energy conservation requires quantization is challenged by considering new beam-split tests and a threshold model (TM). ![]() The problem is best portrayed by a beam-split coincidence test, usually performed with visible light. The unknown mechanism of wave-function collapse is called the measurement problem. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |